Posted by: markstephensarchitect | April 2, 2012

Architects Fee at Practical Completion

This is the continuation of the Post on Architects Fee at Practical Completion and how I nearly got it wrong !

The RIAI divides a domestic agreement into 4 Work Stages:

Work Stage 1 is effectively briefing, analysis, sketch design

Work Stage 2 is effectively up to Planning Application

Work Stage 3 is effectively up to tender and

Work Stage 4 is on site up to Completion.

Now in the previous post I was discussing the percentage of the architects fee at Practical Completion and suggested (as two of the options) 100% and 95% but we’re forgetting that Work Stage 1-3 are complete and that to be in line with the contractor at Practical Completion the architects fee at this stage should be 95% of Work Stage 4 i.e 25% + 25% + 25% + 95% of 25% = 98.75%.

Now, the beauty of being a small company is that you can make ‘turns on a sixpence’ and change company policy instantly, the problem is that the client and Contractor don’t really need you at Completion and there’s a big risk of going unpaid and it is for this reason as you can see from the RESULTS OF THE POLL that the vast majority of those polled chose 100% and it is also for this reason that 100% of my architectural fee is due at Practical Completion.

Posted by: markstephensarchitect | March 29, 2012

Politeness and Architecture

Politeness
>Noun
1. Civility – the act of showing regard for others
2. Niceness – a courteous manner that respects accepted social usage.

It’s a simple word and the principle of politeness is straightforward – just be nice to people, whoever they are and wherever they’re from. But increasingly we’re seeing a complete lack of politeness, whether it’s impatience walking down the street or the increase of the internet ‘troll’ on social media sites and online forums.

The key aspect of politeness is in the definition “that respects accepted social usage”; this is particularly difficult when interacting with a visitor from another country, a different racial group, a different sexuality for example – what may seem impolite to you may be the ‘accepted social usage’ for your overseas guest. What it means therefore is that it is not expected that you actually become identical to that person, just that you try and understand them and demonstrate politeness.

Now, what on earth does this have with ‘how design connects you to people, places, and ideas.’ ? The answer and the idea is straightforward – let’s first try and connect firstly with everybody that we meet, either in real life or in our virtual lives with a little bit more politeness.

But what can I do as an architect with the work that I produce?

Can I introduce politeness into my architecture?

Again, the answer is yes. It is forecast that in Ireland (due to the economic melt-down and the property crash) that the vast majority of architectural projects that are commenced this year will be extensions, renovations and refurbishments of existing properties. Where better for us to start being polite as architects than to show a little politeness to the property we are extending , renovating or refurbishing.

But what exactly does this mean? In the same way that we don’t need to be identical to the person we need to be polite to; we don’t need to slavishly copy the architecture of the existing property; all we need to do is to understand it and to show it a little politeness.

We need to accept the property as it is, and recognize it’s merits, understand it’s proportions, scale and context. And it is only then when we truly understand the building that we as architects can be polite with whatever changes we propose to extend or enhance.

Now, as an architect I speak of the ‘Politeness of Architecture’ but the same principles apply in whatever aspect of the built environment you are involved in; whether it’s urban design, landscape architecture, interior design, conservation – whatever, the same principles of ‘being polite’ apply.

View from rear

The square footage of the existing house has been increased by over 200% but the extensions understand the scale and proportion of the existing house. They are not trying to be identical but are just showing the existing cottage a little politeness.

CLICK HERE for more information on this ‘polite’ project.

So tomorrow, as you go about your everyday business, be a little more polite in your interactions with others and if you’re working in the built environment, make sure your work is showing politeness to what’s around it.

Mark Stephens RIBA MRIAI is a registered and Chartered architect in the UK and Ireland and is fully committed to being polite in his life and work.

Mark Stephens Architects
Rooskey
Foxford, County Mayo
Ireland

For more information CONTACT ME

Posted by: markstephensarchitect | March 26, 2012

Tear Sheet on County Clare House extension added

Continuing on from the last post on the County Clare House extension, reaching Practical Completion, below is a ‘Tear sheet’ on the project giving a few stats, extra information and all the piccies in one place. You can now access all the Tear Sheets (I’m working my way through them) in the Projects section of the web site or via the right side-bar widget:

Tear sheet Clare

To the latest, effectively two extensions to a traditional 1980's built cottage in County Clare.

Posted by: markstephensarchitect | March 24, 2012

Co Clare House Extension reaches Practical Completion

Well, we made it. After dozens of sketch schemes, a stack or pre-planning drawings, heaps of planning revisions, construction drawings, a multitude of tenderers, hours of contract administration and architects instructions…We finally got to Practical Completion; and this blog post shows some photos of the completed project together with the concepts behind them.

Basically, the works were an extension to an 1980′s constructed cottage that was designed and detailed by retired Dublin Architect George A. McCaw. The cottage design was sympathetic in size and scale to traditional cottages in the area (unlike the Bungalow blitz houses that were also built in the same period). The house also had several traditional features such as the concrete barges, vertically proportioned windows and was elegant in concept and execution.

Interestingly, the same contractor was chosen for the extension as constructed the original house; this definitely helped in the construction and detailing – if you look at the new concrete barges they are identical to the existing (albeit a bit newer and cleaner!)

The brief therefore for the extension was to increase the living and bedroom accommodation yet retain the design, integrity and honesty of the original house. So. without further ado, let’s look at some of the photos:

Approach to house

This shows the approach to the house, the central section is the existing and the parts to left and right are new.

The main section of 'new bit'

The main section of 'new bit', separated from the existing by a 1.0m 'buffer' zone. Rather than collide the new into the old, this 'buffer' gives a gentler transition between the two.

1.0m buffer zone

The 1.0m buffer zone described above also creates a line of sight through the house. From front to back, through an internal glass door on through to the view beyond to the sea.

Buffer zone from the rear

Here we see the 'buffer zone' from the other side; the intention was to create a lighter glazed transition zone that creates a gentle abutment to the existing house. It's particularly effective on this side with the larger double rooflights above the vertical glazed panel.

View from rear

Here we see the rear of the house showing the smaller extension to the south and the 'main bit' pushing out towards the sea.

Closer view of glazing detail

This closer view of the glazing detail shows the key concepts of the design: to push the eye out towards the sea (hence the inverted gull-wing roof) and the stepped glass to capture valuable south light and heat yet also make the most of the magnificent views on this location.

Northern side

The views to the north are still pretty good so we've included windows on the side but they're a little smaller in order to minimise heat losses. Note: the glazed handrail at first floor isn't fitted yet.

View from utility roof side light

The views are so intrinsic to the design that even from the utility room the side light to the back door sneaks a view out towards the sea.

So let’s now look at few of the photos from inside, bear in mind that (in the great tradition of architects photos at Practical Completion) these are without client’ furniture!

As discussed the principal concepts behind the design were as follows:

  • To respect the existing house yet add much-needed additional accommodation
  • To Maximise the views to the sea and also maximise solar gain from the south
  • To understand the past but yet to create a contemporary design of the 21st century.So from the front, the house is effectively a more contemporary version of the ‘Irish long house’. It holds the traditional features that were set in the original cottage and follows the same form and scale. We’ve replicated the concrete barges throughout; even down to the structure required to ‘invisibly’ construct them in the ‘buffer zone’. We’ve even added an extra feature of the granny ‘pooch’ lean-to and

    What’s incredible as an architect as well as obviously seeing the built version of your drawings are also the small details that go from just an idea and a drawing into a fully fledged built form. You’ll also see some of these details below as well.

    View to sea at inverted gull-wing roof

    Here we see the stepped glazed facade at the open-plan living/dining/kitchen area. The concept behind the gull-wing roof was to draw your eye out towards the sea views. You can also sea how the south light penetrates the space in these stepped areas

    View towards sea and south

    Here we can see the stepped facade, the glazing and the south light streaming through in this location.

    Granny 'lean-to'

    This Granny 'lean-to' annex forms part of a TV room, the windows are lower to suit the space but form a cosier room ideally for chilling out in.

    Step detail

    Here we see a timber step detail with inset lights, the drop gives additional headroom at first floor level and divides the space neatly between old & new. You can also see the Liscannor internal stone wall beyond.

    Liscannor stone wall with vertically rotating wardrobe window

    A wardrobe is beyond the internal Liscannor stone wall which again maximises the view out to the sea by housing a downlit, vertically rotating internal window

    Vertically rotating internal window

    View from other side of Liscannor stone wall showing view out to sea from Wardrobe area

    Existing living room

    The existing living room and fireplace were untouched except for the window change to a single panoramic window.

    All of the above would have been impossible without a client with vision, an exceptional contractor and an incredible team of structural engineers and environmental consultants. So, a special thanks goes to:

    Contractor:

    Guerin & Considine Ltd – Builders
    Liscannor
    Ennis
    Co. Clare

    Tel: 065 7081283
    Email: guerinandconsidineltd@eircom.net

    Structural Engineer

    Colm O Conaire
    OCCE – O Conaire Consulting Engineers
    Main Street, Ballindine Co. Mayo
    Tel: 094 938 5020
    Email: info@occengineers.ie
    Web: www.occengineers.ie

    Environmental Consultants:

    Safi Environmental Consultants
    Ballyhee
    Larchill Ennis
    Co. Clare

    Tel: 065 6844908
    Email: safi@eircom.net

Posted by: markstephensarchitect | March 19, 2012

Tear Sheets – Part 1 – Underground Grass roofed house…

Let’s get a little Old School for a while and get started on a series of ‘Tear Sheets’ on completed projects.

And the best place to start is the project that started it all off: our own self designed and self-built house in Foxford, County Mayo.

So, this is the first in a series of ‘Tear Sheets’ giving a little data and images of completed jobs. Below is the sheet, clicking on it will open the higher resolution pdf:
Tear Sheet 1
This is the first and I’ll be adding more ‘as and when…’

Posted by: markstephensarchitect | March 16, 2012

The role of the architect during the build…

This short Fact Sheet on the ‘Role of the Architect During Building Operations’ explains the change in role to arbitrator of contract between Client and Contractor. It’s also going to get added into the Fact Sheets in the right hand side bar.

Comments Welcome…

Posted by: markstephensarchitect | March 14, 2012

How could I have forgotten this rule for clients ?

How could I have forgotten Rule Number 9. It sounds bloody obvious but…

“If you make your building bigger, use more of something e.g tiling or put more expensive things in it then your contractor will charge you more”.

Trust me, you’d be surprised!

Here’s the updated Fact Sheet on the 9 Rules for Clients

Well there’s nothing like a blatant advert is there. I’ve been trying to break into architectural education in Ireland (I have extensive lecturing experience in the UK). So if you’d like to find out more about me, my architecture and lecturing experience: CLICK HERE FOR MY ‘ARCHITECTURE & EDUCATION’ CV (3.8mB)

ps Coming back to the UK is that tricky; can get to Stansted or Luton within the hour

Posted by: markstephensarchitect | March 9, 2012

Continuation of last post; architects fees at Practical Completion

This follows on from the last post/poll about Architects fees at Practical Completion and I got to thinking about my sons teeth…

Well, my son has had braces for the last 18 months to straighten out his teeth. His last visit is in 3 weeks time where the braces will be removed and a removable retainer will be fitted.

We are expected to pay for the entirety of these orthodontic services when the braces are removed. Not at the regular inspections post this removal or in 6 months time when the retainer is to be removed.

See where I’m going with this… When the braces are effectively removed you can skip off without theoretically needing the experts services; by the same analogy when the Practical Completion certificate is done the client and contractor can effectively skip off without paying for the architects final payment.

Therefore I ask again, have a think about it and cast a vote on what you think a realistic percentage of the architect’s fee at Practical Completion, personally I can only see one answer and I think you know what I think it is…(but I don’t want to influence you).

Posted by: markstephensarchitect | March 8, 2012

Architects Fee at Practical Completion [Poll]

This is something that arisen very recently and it seems to be an interesting topic for architects (judging by the great response from fellow professionals on a recent tweet):

What is the percentage of the architects fee that should be paid at Practical Completion?

The RIAI Domestic Agreement leaves it open; if you are working in line with the contractors agreement the answer is 95% (assuming a 10% retention) but many are saying that in today’s climate then a more realistic answer should be 100%, this is for a number of reasons:

1. You’ve been on the project for a long time already and it’s highly unlikely you’re going to skip off at this stage

2. The architects role at this stage is administrative only and the 5% to get to completion does not correlate with the amount of work that the architect is to undertake

3. Why should the architect be the last one to get paid, frequently at this stage there is no money left and the architect remains unpaid; what other profession regularly writes of 5% of the bill in this way?

I’m forever saying that we’re living in a complete different economic world than even a few years ago and remember that Ireland is in a complete different economic world than the majority of the rest of Europe. It’s standard practice now that during the construction period Architects are paid in stages as per the certificates/draw downs (this is only casually mentioned in the RIAI Domestic Agreement ‘Interim Payments may be made, by agreement, during any work stage’.

So, I’m going to ask you my dear readers – What should be the percentage of the Architects fee that should be paid at Practical Completion?

You’ll be able to see the results and I’ll post the results in due course…

Posted by: markstephensarchitect | March 4, 2012

How I finally ‘get’ Linkedin…

View Mark Stephens's profile on LinkedIn

Now I’ve been on LinkedIn for ages and I knew how it worked but I never really ‘got it’ until recently. Probably because I’m a sole-trader architect, without staff and without having to look for a job. The occasion has arisen recently where I had to send out a CV and the benefits (as I can see) of LinkedIn are as follows:

  • Being able to research/check the employment record of your potential employer/staff member
  • To research and check the educational record of a potential employer/staff member
  • To see what areas of common interest there are between you and your potential employer/staff member
  • To contribute to groups and pitch yourself as the expert in a given field.

    There’s probably stacks more and please let me know (comment) on how LinkedIn has helped you and I’ll add them to post.

    Anyhows, if you want to link with me (I’ve extensively edited and added to my profile – it now contains every gory detail of my background) – CLICK HERE TO LINK WITH ME or click on the button below:

    View Mark Stephens's profile on LinkedIn

    Comments as always welcome…

  • Posted by: markstephensarchitect | March 1, 2012

    Sole Architect as roller coaster driver

    Continuing the ‘Architect as…’ theme, this quick post is just to say how sometimes when you’re a sole trader that it feels like you’re driving a roller coaster.

    One minute its “I have no work, crap”, and a second later “I’ve got too much work, I need to get help”. From:

    “My clients are such a lovely, warm bunch” to “Argh, Clientzillas!”

    The problem is that as we all know a roller coaster doesn’t actually have a driver, and business gets out of control, up and down, twisting and turning. The fact is however I wouldn’t want it any other way and you just have to bend and go with the flow; as the guy in Jerry Maguire said “Go with the punches, tomorrow’s another day”…

    Roller coaster from Jaunted.com

    Roller coaster from Jaunted.com

    Comments as ever welcome…

    Posted by: markstephensarchitect | February 27, 2012

    8 Architect Rules for Clients

    I’ve been thinking about this one for a while and (as usual) kicked into action by Bob Borson’ excellent blog Life of an Architect So…

    CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD 8 RULES FOR CLIENTS (108KB)

    You can also download this fact sheet from the right side ‘Important Stuff before you start’ widget.

    The eagle-eyed among you will also spot I’ve changed the layout on the Fact Sheet

    Posted by: markstephensarchitect | February 24, 2012

    How much does an architect cost? (again) & variations…

    I’ve written about this previously but I’m adding a couple of interesting bits here. The purpose of this blog post isn’t going to discuss the normal ways that an architect charges. The RIAI has an excellent section on their website covering this, CLICK HERE to see this. Architect Bob Borson has also written on this subject CLICK HERE FOR THIS INFORMATION.

    Instead this blog post covers the architects fees when changes are made during the build.

    It should first be emphasised that any changes should be kept to a minimum; what can seem like a simple change can have massive repercussions further down the line with consultants work, additional information etc… The way to reduce these ‘variations’ are to ensure that the construction drawings, specification and tender information are as thorough as possible. Too often I see builds rushing ahead with the most barest of information; in Ireland frequently I see works built from the planning drawings which include the absolute minimum of specification (frequently just enough notes for Building Regulations) and absolutely no detail regarding the exact finishes and details.

    What I’m talking about requires great thought and input from the client; just a few examples could be:

  • Type, finish and design of doors, skirting, architraves
  • Type of tiles for walls & floors, timber flooring, staircase…
  • Shower enclosures, type, finish, who’s fitting them…
  • Toilet roll holders, medicine cabinets…
  • Curtain rails…

    The list is endless.

    It should be very clear therefore that if a ‘variation’ occurs which requires the architect to produce more work then obviously that work would need to be paid for. The rules are very straightforward and are covered in the RIAI Agreements (the following is for when the architect is paid on a percentage of the construction cost):

    1. After building work is done, the value [on which the architects fee is based] is taken from the final total construction cost for the work.

    2. The architect is paid on a basis of the final total construction cost (described above) which obviously includes variations, “including fitting-out and loose furniture work with which the architect is involved.”. The last few words here are very important ‘which the architect is involved’; there needs to therefore be some form of coordination of drawings or additional drawings/detail drawing, coordinated administrative work or additional site supervision/inspection in order for this to be the case.

    Contrary to popular belief, as an architect I do not want to push the price up in order to get more money; I want to deliver a project on time and to the clients budget – if the client wants to spend more on any particular aspect that requires additional work, responsibility or inspection then I should be paid for that work.

    Raft corner

    Here's a corner of a recently poured raft foundation; I check levels and dimensions, steel fixings, formwork and Radon barrier with structural engineer prior to pouring and then a check after then check again after pour prior to blockwork construction for curing.

    A special thanks to Architects Isabel Barros and Form Architecture and as always Bob Borson for their input on this topic.

    Comments as always welcome…

  • Posted by: markstephensarchitect | February 23, 2012

    Pinterest and how I’m using it…

    Sometimes you see a web technology happen so fast it takes your breath away; and pinterest is such a thing. The concept is easy, you pin any image from any web site,iPhone or iPad into a collection of boards. The boards can be what ever you want them to be.

    The easiest way to explain is to simply see it; CLICK HERE FOR MY PINTEREST BOARDS or click on the image below for a selection of my ‘Completed Projects’:
    pinterest_completed.

    You can also see the Completed Projects on the right widget sidebar and every post now also has a pinterest ‘PinIt’ button.

    This is still ‘Work in progress’ and will always be, and I’ll be adding a lot more images over time…

    « Newer Posts - Older Posts »

    Categories